Would You Consider a Donation to Help Fund the Work I Do?

Am asking those who believe in me and the work I do to consider a regular or periodic donation. My immediate goals are to be able to get more information out faster, to increase efficiency and use of time. Monetary support would be much appreciated as all past help I have received, both monetary and otherwise, has been much appreciated, praise GOD/ELOHIM who gives to us all!

GOD/ELOHIM needs workers full time, meaning not even spending time working a secular job to bring in money but to devote all of ones time to further HIS Kingdom as many who have churches and ministries do. I can’t join one church and cut off all others as GOD/ELOHIM is using me across all denominations to do HIS work. The early church in Acts was one mind and heart and the present church is very divided. I have to include everyone as brothers and sisters in CHRIST/the MESSIAH and believe that is part of what HE is calling me to do. CHRIST/the MESSIAH also wants help with the lost and perishing, the ones HE leaves the 99 for to go after the 1, and all else HE has asked us for help with.

I feel I have posted enough info about me and the work I do to show my heart and actions in regards to doing work for our PRECIOUS BELOVED SAVIOR/KING YESHUA/JESUS. I have been told that a blessing am I, that what I share is helpful and inspirational, and praise GOD/ELOHIM for answering prayers that have been lifted up to HIM!  That all is wonderful and blessed am I to have these blessings but money is still needed to live and function in our present world. I feel there is enough evidence that am doing Kingdom work and that it is bearing fruit. Others who do full time work for GOD/ELOHIM get support for expensive salaries and buildings and much else. My needs are pretty simple in comparison and I have lived with very little trying to do this. It has been very hard living this way and I have also dealt with much disbelief and ridicule and rejection but know am gaining heavenly rewards, praise our BLESSED BELOVED FATHER in Heaven!

While I do have other things on my “would like to have” and my “would like to replace” lists, am immediately looking to buy a bicycle that will also hold my belongings so I do not have to walk so much. Would really like to get this asap. Am considering a multi gear bicycle that costs $399 and would work with my height and long skirts. If everyone who sees this could help with a $25 donation a month what a blessing that would be! If you know anyone else who would be interested in helping with support, please share my information and blog with them. I have a paypal donate button on the blog in the upper right corner. Much thanks for your help to our BELOVED FATHER in Heaven in HIS BELOVED SON’S PRECIOUS NAME, YESHUA HA’MASHIACH YHWH/JESUS CHRIST the LORD, AMEN!

Blessings and Shalom and may GOD’S/ELOHIM’S Will and Desire be accomplished with and through us all!  Please see this link for more specific information on the work I have done:   http://glclifestyling.com/2014/01/06/information-on-me/

Gail

It is not too late to bring a gift to your KING that HE would love!

Our BELOVED FATHER in Heaven,

Blessed be YOU, YOUR LAMB our SAVIOR and the HOLY SPIRIT continually for Eternity!  YESHUA/JESUS, what would YOU like for YOUR Birthday and do YOU like extended Birthdays if my gift is late? Thank YOU so very much for the GIFT YOU gave me of YOU!

Please teach me how I can be a gift to others and how to make it a gift YOU would love! I know it is easy to give money and harder to be involved like YOU said to do so please help me not to do the easy thing but to do what YOU want! I know YOU have a reason for saying what YOU said and I do not want to miss out on a blessing, that I might not know or understand, through being a blessing to others personally.

I pray this through YOU JESUS CHRIST the LORD/YESHUA HA’MASHIACH YHWH even in all YOUR BELOVED, PRECIOUS NAMES, because YOU cover YOUR people, AMEN!!!

Blessings in CHRIST’S/the MESSIAH’S Birth/Conception!

The Parable of the Lost Sheep from Matthew 18
11“For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost. 12“What do you think? If any man has a hundred sheep, and one of them has gone astray, does he not leave the ninety-nine on the mountains and go and search for the one that is straying? 13“If it turns out that he finds it, truly I say to you, he rejoices over it more than over the ninety-nine which have not gone astray.…

Do you remember reading Little Women? On Christmas morning, they were greeted with a knock on their door about a family who was in need and ill. The women decided to forgo their breakfast and presents and bundled everything up to take to this family in need. How is that not the true spirit of JESUS/YESHUA?

I try to show people things from a different perspective. Try imagining what it is like to be in need and living in a car, or in the woods in a tent, or you do not know where you will be sleeping or if you will be allowed to sleep and put yourself in their shoes and try to imagine what they must be going through. Yes, there are homeless who do not want to work or have addictions or mental illness and some are the lost sheep JESUS/YESHUA referred to in Scripture and some are fools who will never be saved. Can you tell the difference? Some who use others are very clever and use the right lingo to get what they want until they give themselves away. There are also those who found themselves in a situation that brought them very low and they have not been able to find the way up and out. If you were in their shoes, how would you want to be treated and what would you need to get lifted up? This is a true statement: there are people failing because they can’t get what they need to get up again!

If you have a roof over your head and a vehicle and are healthy and have food and have money, then blessed with abundance are you compared to a great deal of the world! How much are you actually using and how much is sitting around getting rusty and drawing moths to it? Look up Bible verses about rust and moths and what is earthly treasure and what is TRUE treasure in GOD’S EYES! How much stuff does one need and is it first in your heart or is JESUS/YESHUA first as HE commands? Look back at the first paragraph above and think about what you can give instead of what you can receive. It may end up becoming a blessing of bringing someone to righteousness, giving/getting the help they need to prosper, saving a lost sheep which are the ones the SHEPHERD went after! What gift will you give your KING on HIS Birthday, not yours, that would bring joy to JESUS’S/YESHUA’S Heart!

Is Jesus/YESHUA this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOSiZIgZ2JQ

Or is Jesus/YESHUA this:

http://glclifestyling.com/2014/12/this-is-what-christ-really-wants-for-christmas-gospel-for-asia-christs-call-follow-my-footsteps/  [what does JESUS/YESHUA really want done to honor HIM]

http://glclifestyling.com/2012/12/youre-right-there-is-no-christ-in-christmas-2/     [how GOD covers HIS people and what to examine in regards to what is HIM and what is HIS enemy ]

http://glclifestyling.com/2014/09/happy-birthday-yahshuajesus/    [info on JESUS/YAHSHUA’S conception and birth and verses about HIM]

http://glclifestyling.com/2013/12/the-return-of-the-true-king-and-his-priceless-gift-of-270-days/  [info on his conception and birth and about HIS return]

 

Matthew 1: The answer to the question is 42 not 41!

When reading from the Institute for Scripture Research’s “The Scriptures” translation of the Bible, I found they listed the missing name from the genealogies in Matthew/Mattityahu 1. The missing name is in verse 13 and is Abner or Avner. They said they found it in the Hebrew text of the book of Matthew/Mattityahu called the du Tillet. In Matthew/Mattityahu chapter 1 there are supposed to be listed 42 names grouped in 3 sets of 14 generations each. There are actually only 41 names in most translations. I believe many do not realize this name is missing in most Bibles including the King James. Continue reading

Organic Consumers Association: Victory with gmo labeling for 2015!

Thank YOU our BELOVED ABBA/FATHER in Heaven for ALL YOUR help with this and ALL YOU and YESHUA/JESUS and the HOLY SPIRIT did, are doing, and will be doing!!! What a huge blessing our BELOVED ELOHIM/GOD is to us! May one day, we all know and understand all YOU have done in stopping and destroying everything to do with darkness! Todah rabah, thank YOU very much!!! In the BELOVED NAMES of YOUR PRECIOUS SON and even HIS NAMES that HE covers HIS people in, YESHUA HA’MASHIACH YHWH/JESUS CHRIST the LORD, AMEN!!!

#regenerate!

“The key to the future of the world is finding the optimistic stories and letting them be known.” – Pete Seeger

Dear Organic Consumer, 

A number of online fundraising appeals popped up in my inbox this week, most of them alluding to our “troubled times” and “dark days ahead.”

I understand why people feel this way. But I’m an optimist. And I believe most of you are, too. As optimists, it’s our job to do more than just rail against the bad. We must also find—better yet, create—the “optimistic stories” and “let them be known.”

With your help, that’s what we’ll do in 2016. We’ve already started.

Mercola.com and Dr. Bronner’s have once again stepped up to match your donation to OCA. Please help us raise $250,000 by midnight December 31, so we can take advantage of this generous offer. You can donate online, by U.S. mail or by calling our office—details here.

As I write this today, it’s clear your voices have been heard in Congress, at least on the matter of allowing states to enact GMO labeling laws. Thanks to your support this past year, Monsanto couldn’t get a bipartisan version of the DARK Act (H.R. 1599, a bill to preempt GMO labeling laws) introduced, much less passed, in the Senate.

And thanks to a massive mobilization effort, including hundreds of meetings, protests, petition drives and phone banks directed toward Congressional home district and DC offices, we’ve blocked Monsanto and Big Food from attaching a GMO labeling-preemption rider to the year-end federal budget deal. Even better? We forced the FDA to require mandatory labeling of GMO salmon! Until the labeling guidelines are finalized, there will be no frankenfish in our grocery stores.

This is your victory. It may be temporary, but it’s huge. Monsanto will come roaring back in January to try to preempt state laws again. But for now, Vermont’s GMO labeling law, set to take effect July 1, is safe.

Safeguarding Vermont’s GMO labeling law, and passing similar laws in other states, are worthy goals. We will not lose sight of these goals in 2016.

But let’s face it. The GMO ingredients in our food represent only 20 percent of the total market for GMO crops. The other 80 percent of GMO crops go into making ethanol and feeding the billions of animals incarcerated, in unconscionably inhumane and unhealthy conditions, in factory farms.

The hundreds of thousands of acres of monoculture crops, sprayed with toxic pesticides like glyphosate, and grown in soil that is degraded by synthetic chemicals, are wreaking havoc with our soils, our waterways, our health, our climate.

We absolutely must win the right to know if our food contains GMOs. But our movement must be bigger than that. We must set our sights on building a new global food and farming system. We must bring down the degenerative, Monsanto-style agriculture system and replace it with one that regenerates—soil, health, economies, climate stability.

Regeneration is the new frontier of the organic food and farming movement. It is our next “optimistic story.” It is a story of healing. Of renewal. Of hope.

And the best part of this story is that we have the power to write it. Our choices as consumers, our choices as activists, our choices as voters will drive the plot.

If we don’t step up to regenerate our food system and our ecosystem, corporations like Monsanto will define the future. Corporations won’t change unless we force them to change. Elected officials won’t listen to us unless we force them to listen.

My optimism has been fueled by this latest victory to preserve states’ rights to label GMOs. With your help, I believe we can move on to bigger and better victories. Our future depends on it.

Please help us raise $250,000 by midnight December 31, so we can take advantage of a matching funds challenge from Mercola.com and Dr. Bronner’s.  You can donate online, by snail mail or by calling our office—details here.

Thank you! And happy, healthy holidays from all of us at OCA.

Ronnie Cummins
National Director, Organic Consumers Association and Organic Consumers Fund

P.S. We have until midnight December 31 to take advantage of this matching grant. Please make a generous donation today. Donations made to the the Organic Consumers Association, a 501(c)(3) are tax-deductible. If you don’t need the tax deduction, please consider making a donation to our 501(c)(4) lobbying arm by clicking here. Thank you!

 

The True News: The GMO Dark Act Cannot Survive the Light!

The GMO Dark Act Cannot Survive the Light

by Steven M. Druker

The GMO Dark Act Cannot Survive the Light

(Independent Science News) An ardent attempt is afoot on Capitol Hill to prevent states from requiring the labeling of genetically engineered foods – made especially urgent by the fact that Vermont’s labeling bill is set to take effect July 1st. Although proponents of these foods scored a major victory in July when they induced the House of Representatives to pass a bill (HR 1599) that would ban such state-enacted legislation, a version of that bill has not yet been introduced in the Senate; and because of the intense focus on crafting and passing crucial legislation that will provide necessary funding to keep the federal government functioning, none is likely to be during this session. Accordingly, biotech advocates are endeavoring to get key provisions of HR 1599 attached as a rider to the must-pass appropriations bill – and sneak them into law without meaningful scrutiny and debate. But this attempt could be quickly foiled by one simple occurrence: the dissemination of a few essential facts. Moreover, if these facts had been widely known in July, HR 1599 could not have even made it through the House. That’s because the bill has always relied on disinformation – and could not survive an open airing of the truth. Continue reading

Neil Young, Willie Nelson, Dave Matthews, John Mellencamp helping to stop the DARK Act!

Neil Young, Willie Nelson, Dave Matthews, John Mellencamp: Help Us Stop the DARK Act

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/34051-neil-young-willie-nelson-dave-matthews-john-mellencamp-help-us-stop-the-dark-act

By Lorraine Chow, EcoWatch

15 December 15

ave Matthews, Willie Nelson, John Mellencamp and Neil Young are speaking out against the controversial Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act (H.R. 1599), also known as the Deny Americans the Right to Know, or DARK Act.

The legislation would require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate the distribution and labeling of genetically modified foods (GMOs), thus preempting states’ rights to label GMOs themselves.

The famous musicians, who serve as board members of Farm Aid, signed a joint letter calling on President Obama to stop the DARK Act rider, which some lawmakers in Congress are trying to sneak onto to the year-end omnibus spending bill.

“Giant food, chemical and biotech corporations have spent millions of dollars to block our right to know what’s in our food. Their latest effort is to pass what’s been called the DARK (Deny Americans the Right to Know) Act,” Farm Aid wrote on a Facebook post last Friday. “It would preempt GMO labeling laws already passed in Connecticut, Maine and Vermont and obstruct mandatory federal labeling of GMOs.” Continue reading

Info on GMO Labeling Debate and Toxic Herbicide from Dr. Mercola

Approval for Toxic Herbicide May Be Rescinded, and GMO Labeling Debate Heats Up Another Notch

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/12/15/toxic-herbicide-gmo-labeling-debate.aspx

December 15, 2015 | 147,302 views
 By Dr. Mercola

As glyphosate overuse has led to widespread weed resistance to the chemical, newer, more toxic herbicides have been approved for use on food crops. One such herbicide is Enlist Duo, a combination of glyphosate and 2,4-D, one of the ingredients in Agent Orange.

Enlist Duo is made by Dow AgroSciences, which like Monsanto, sells both genetically engineered seeds and the pesticides they’re designed to withstand. And like Monsanto, Dow apparently has few qualms about bending the rules to get their toxic wares to market.

Dow Busted Making Contradictory Claims

As reported by NPR:1

“Dow AgroSciences … made contradictory claims to different parts of the U.S. government about its latest herbicide. The Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] just found out, and now wants to cancel Dow’s legal right to sell the product …

When Dow applied for permission to sell Enlist Duo in 2011, it told the EPA that this mixture of glyphosate and 2,4-D is no more toxic than the two chemicals are, if considered separately. The EPA accepted that argument and approved the new herbicide just over a year ago …

Several environmental groups went to court to overturn the EPA decision, arguing that combining these two chemicals could result in new ‘synergistic’ toxic effects that the EPA had ignored.

And in the course of that litigation, the EPA discovered that Dow had been telling the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office a different story.

When applying for a patent, an inventor needs to show that something is novel and useful. And Dow’s patent application for Enlist Duo claims that this mixture of chemicals does, in fact, offer farmers something new: ‘synergistic herbicidal weed control.'”

The EPA requested more information from Dow to clarify these “synergistic effects” on non-target plants, and on November 9, the company complied.

The EPA has declined to disclose any details, but have asked the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals2 to reverse its approval of Enlist Duo pending a full evaluation of this additional information.

EPA Ignored Signs of Health Problems Detected by Dow Scientists

Crazy enough, a breaking story in the Chicago Tribune3 reveals that the EPA is hardly a public hero in this case.

On the contrary, the paper’s investigation found that EPA scientists Linda Taylor and Elizabeth Mendez modified their analysis of an animal study conducted by Dow, rejecting findings of kidney problems that Dow’s own scientists concluded were due to 2,4-D exposure.

By doing so, the EPA came up with a safety level for 2,4-D that is 41 times higher than previous assessments.

This is a chemical that has been linked to cancer and other health problems, and according to exposure projections, once Enlist Duo becomes widely used American children could consume levels of 2.4-D that a number of different nations consider unsafe, including the World Health Organization, Russia, Korea, Canada, and China.

According to the Tribune:

“The EPA scientists who revised that crucial document were persuaded by a Canadian government toxicologist [Lauri Stachiw] who decided that Dow — a company that has a $1 billion product at stake — had been overly cautious in flagging kidney abnormalities that she deemed insignificant …

In an interview, Mendez said she and Taylor looked at the data again after Stachiw called. Mendez said they decided the lesions Dow had labeled as toxic effects were actually a healthy response.

‘It’s a good thing that the kidney is gearing itself up for battle to get rid of the compound from the body,’ she said …

When Dow later published this study, the company’s scientists likewise dismissed their earlier concerns and changed the most important measure of the chemical’s toxicity so it agreed with the EPA’s less stringent view.

These decisions paved the way for the EPA to approve Dow’s weedkiller Enlist Duo last year and reassure the public that a surge in 2,4-D use wouldn’t hurt anyone.”

EPA Recklessly Ignores Precautionary Principle

The EPA is charged with protecting children from harmful pesticides, so to find out that it would flagrantly dismiss hazards revealed (and admitted!) by Dow’s own researchers is truly shocking.

Numerous studies have shown that industry-funded research overwhelmingly favors the product and downplays risks; the converse of what this Canadian pesticide regulator — identified as Lauri Stachiw — argued.

Moreover, the Tribune also found that five earlier studies, submitted in the 1980s by an industry group representing Dow and other 2,4-D manufacturers, had similar kidney abnormalities — and at far lower doses than the EPA’s latest safety level.

At present, the EPA’s safety level for 2,4-D of 7 mg/kg is actually a level at which rats have been shown to suffer multiple effects, including kidney lesions, and changes to their thyroid function and reproductive organs.

Can You Trust EPA’s 2,4-D Safety Assessment?

The EPA’s reversal of Enlist Duo’s approval is guaranteed to be temporary. In fact, The Tribune notes that “EPA officials made it clear they don’t intend to bar the product permanently.”

The EPA also insists that the reversal has nothing to do with human health risks, and that it just wants to “iron out” concerns that synergistic effects might make the glyphosate-2,4-D mix more toxic than each chemical in isolation.

This will not involve more rigorous research however. The EPA has stated it will not require studies in which rats are chronically dosed with Enlist Duo, meaning the two chemicals in combination.

This decision also defies belief, considering the fact that numerous studies have confirmed that even non-toxic chemicals can become toxic when combined, and here we’re dealing with two chemicals known to have toxic influences. In all likelihood, Enlist Duo will gain re-approval; perhaps with a few more safety instructions to protect endangered plants, but that’s about it.

I predict this will happen because as far as the EPA is concerned, Enlist Duo is perfectly safe, even if farmers were to use it on every single acre of corn and soybeans growing in the US. The whole thing sounds like a repeat of Monsanto’s Roundup debacle.

Before glyphosate was reclassified as a Class 2A “probable carcinogen” earlier this year, Monsanto claimed it was completely biodegradable and safer than table salt. Now Dow and the EPA wants you to believe that 2,4-D in combination with glyphosate is completely safe even if it’s in every meal you serve your kids, and even though no safety testing on this exact combination has been conducted.

Only a fool would buy into such assurances. As reported by the Tribune:

“The fact that 2,4-D was a main component of the Vietnam War-era defoliant Agent Orange made the chemical infamous, even though it was dioxin contamination … that brought harm to troops and villagers. Over the years … researchers showed 2,4-D was worrisome on its own.

Studies found increased odds of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, hypothyroidism and Parkinson’s disease among people who used the chemical as part of their jobs. In June, the WHO’s cancer research agency ruled that 2,4-D is a possible carcinogen. But EPA scientists aren’t convinced that 2,4-D causes any of those diseases because other studies reached different conclusions.”

GE crops like corn and soy add to animal and human health problems, as well as environmental hazards, and the toxic effects of the herbicides used on these crops is part and parcel of the problem. Temporarily delaying Enlist Duo from being doused on our food isn’t good enough. It needs to be stopped, and we also need to get genetically engineered organisms (also known as genetically modified organisms or GMOs) labeled. Without labeling, many Americans will continue to buy products they might not buy were they fully informed.

9 in 10 Americans Want to Know If Their Food Is GMO

According to the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), 80 percent of the foods on your grocery store’s shelves contain GMOs4 — which also tend to contain the highest amounts of toxic pesticides — but which ones are they? A December 2015 poll reveals that 9 out of 10 Americans now want to know if their food is genetically engineered. Moreover, 88 percent want that information to be listed on the food label, rather than having to use a smartphone app to find the information.

A mere 16 percent of respondents say they’ve ever scanned a QR code to get information about a product, and it’s simply not a workable method when you have a cart full of food packages to scan through. The poll reveals GMO labeling has majority support from all political parties — Democrats, Republicans, and independents — and even a majority of people who view GMOs favorably want GMO’s to be clearly labeled.

As noted in a press release by Just Label It!:5

“The poll, commissioned by a coalition of consumer and environmental groups, comes at a timely moment. In Congress, some lawmakers want to add a provision to the omnibus spending bill that would block states from requiring GMO labels for produce and processed food, as would the so-called DARK Act passed by the House last summer.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration just approved the sale of genetically engineered salmon – which grows to maturity twice as fast as normal salmon and is cobbled together from the genes of different species – but the FDA will not require the salmon to be labeled.”

On November 30, 2015, a broad coalition of more than 290 environmental, farming, and fishing groups, as well as food companies sent a letter6,7 to Congressional leaders, opposing the plan to add a DARK Act Policy Rider to the “must pass” omnibus appropriations bill, which would preempt state laws that require disclosure of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food.

QR Codes Are NOT an Adequate Substitute for Package Labels

“The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act,” better known and more appropriately called the DARK Act (Deny Americans Right to Know) prevents states from creating their own food labeling requirements for GMOs, and if passed by the Senate, it would rescind Vermont’s labeling law, set to take effect in July 2016.

However, the Senate has been reluctant to pass this bill, and to push it through, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) is trying to get the Senate to go along with a “compromise” that involves using QR codes8 instead of labeling genetically engineered (GE) foods. QR stands for Quick Response, and the code can be scanned and read by smart phones and other QR readers.9 The code brings you to a product website that provides further details about the product.

But these so-called “Smart Labels” hardly improve access to information. Instead, by making finding the truth time consuming and cumbersome, food makers can be assured that most Americans will remain ignorant about the presence of GMOs in their products. Besides, everyone has a right to know what’s in the food. You shouldn’t have to own a smartphone to obtain this information.

Relying on ‘Smart Labels’ for GMO Information Is Presently Impossible

In a recent blog post,10 the Environmental Working Group (EWG) lists a total of 10 reasons why the Smart Label proposal can’t work and must be rejected. This includes:

  • Consumers Won’t Know to Scan – There would be no prompt – like ‘scan here for GMO’ – on the package, so consumers wouldn’t even know that scanning the code would give them more information about their food.
  • GMO Information Hidden – Even if consumers did scan the code, GMO information would be hidden under ‘other’ information, and the disclosure wouldn’t definitively tell consumers what they want to know – whether the food has GMO ingredients. And the Grocery Manufacturers Association admits that Smart Label would have no rules governing what is a ‘GMO.’
  • It’s Completely Voluntary – Food companies can choose whether or not to include a code on their packages and can drop out of the program at any time. That’s crazy.
  • No Enforcement – Not only would Smart Label have no rules, it would have no enforcement. There is no way to know whether the codes would provide accurate information or whether in-store scanners (if there are any) would even work.
  • No Deadlines – Smart Label would set no deadlines for companies to put codes on packages and no deadlines for them to update their data when products are reformulated to include GMO ingredients.

As noted by Lisa Archer, food and technology program director at Friends of the Earth:

“GMO labeling via QR code technology is unworkable, threatens privacy, and is discriminatory since more than a third of Americans, many of which are low-income or live in rural areas with poor internet access, don’t own smartphones. FDA’s approval of GMO salmon makes it all the more urgent that Congress require mandatory, universally accessible GMO labeling that any consumer can read on the package when they’re choosing what to feed their families.”

Important Action Item: Speak to Your Senators

If you haven’t already done so, I urge you to contact your Senators to tell them that QR codes are NOT a viable substitute for GMO labeling. In fact, QR codes or Smart Labels are inherently discriminatory, since you cannot use them unless you own a smartphone. Thirty-six percent of Americans do not own one.11 Moreover, only half of low income people and those living in rural areas own a smartphone.

The DARK Act12,13,14,15 preempts state rights and violates individual rights, and as such must not pass. Implementing QR codes does not change that. Democrats from agricultural states in particular need to be reminded about the President’s executive order on preemption of state rights and standing up for the rights of consumers. As noted in a 2009 article by the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies:16

“On May 20, 2009, President Obama issued a Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies on preemption. The purpose of that Memorandum was to declare the new Administration’s ‘general policy’ to be that ‘preemption of State law by executive departments and agencies should be undertaken only with full consideration of the legitimate prerogatives of the States and with a sufficient legal basis for preemption.’

The President explained that, even though the Federal Government’s role in promoting the general welfare is ‘critical,’ the States play a concurrent and often more aggressive role in protecting the health and safety of their citizens and the environment. He stated that overreaching by the Federal Government with respect to preemption limits the ability of the States to ‘apply to themselves rules and principles that reflect the[ir own particular] circumstances and values …’

The President’s Memorandum discouraging regulatory preemption comes against a backdrop of calls from Congress and others for increased regulation in a variety of areas. If put into law, market participants will have to shoulder greater regulatory burdens, but they will not receive immunity from state court lawsuits by doing so unless Congress provides for such immunity.”

You can also find your Senators’ contact information by calling the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121. A phone call has greater impact than an email, but a face-to-face meeting is usually the most impactful of all. In addition to contacting the two Senators representing your state, you can also sign the Food Democracy Now!’s petition, addressed to members of Congress, the FDA, and the President Obama.

Monsanto to Stand Trial for Crimes Against Humanity

While American politicians are all too eager to succumb to Monsanto’s monstrous plans, dozens of food, farming, and environmental justice groups have announced they will put Monsanto on trial for “crimes against nature and humanity” on October 16, 2016 (which happens to be World Food Day), in The Hague, Netherlands.

As reported by Sustainable Pulse:17

“Relying on the ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ adopted by the UN in 2011, an international court of lawyers and judges will assess the potential criminal liability of Monsanto for damages inflicted on human health and the environment.

The court will also rely on the Rome Statute that created the International Criminal Court in The Hague in 2002, and it will consider whether to reform international criminal law to include crimes against the environment, or ecocide, as a prosecutable criminal offense …

Andre Leu, president of IFOAM and a member of the RI Steering Committee, said: ‘Monsanto is able to ignore the human and environmental damage caused by its products, and maintain its devastating activities through a strategy of systemic concealment: by lobbying regulatory agencies and governments, by resorting to lying and corruption, by financing fraudulent scientific studies, by pressuring independent scientists, and by manipulating the press and media.

Monsanto’s history reads like a text-book case of impunity, benefiting transnational corporations and their executives, whose activities contribute to climate and biosphere crises and threaten the safety of the planet.”

URGENT: Two Major Issues to Set Our Senators Straight on Before It’s Too Late

It’s imperative to concentrate our efforts on our senators right now, and to inform them accurately. They’re being deceived by industry lobbyists, and this is our last chance to preserve our right to know what is in our food.

For example, Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan) introduced a bill that would preempt states’ rights to enact GMO labeling laws. It would specifically prohibit Congress or individual states from requiring mandatory labeling of GMO foods or ingredients. It would also allow food manufacturers to use the word “natural” on products that contain GMOs.

Unfortunately, the bill has been passed in the House and now heads to the Senate. It’s critical that you contact your senators today urging them to not support HR 1599. Tell them this bill is an attack on consumer rights and states’ rights, and you expect your elected officials to protect you.
In addition, the FDA has now cleared the way for GE (Genetically Engineered) Atlantic salmon to be farmed for human consumption. The product will not require special labelling because it’s claimed to be nutritionally equivalent to conventional farm-raised Atlantic salmon. By allowing this there is no guarantee GE salmon will not enter the wild, which can be detrimental to the ecosystem.

The biotech industry is trying to push the QR code as an answer for consumer concerns about GE foods. QR stands for Quick Response, and the code can be scanned and read by smart phones and other QR readers. The code brings you to a product website that provides further details about the product. There’s nothing forcing companies to declare GMOs on their website. On the contrary, HR 1599 allows GMOs to be promoted as “natural,” which further adds to the confusion.

The FDA is threatening the existence of our food supply. We have to start taking action now. I urge you to share this information with friends and family. If we act together, we can make a difference and put an end to the absurdity.

You can find your senators’ contact information by clicking the button below, or by calling the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121. To set up an in-person meeting with your senators, contact their district office. Remember, here are the two points you should address when contacting them:

  • Do not support HR 1599 — consumers have the right to know what’s in their food
  • You demand mandatory, on-package labeling of GMOs — and any compromise, including a voluntary labeling QR code scheme, is unacceptable.

Non-GMO Food Resources by Country

 

GOD sends out HIS Wrath to ease HIS displeasure!

ISR – Ezekiel/Yechezk’El 5:13 ‘And My displeasureH639 shall be completed. And I shall bring My wrath H2534to rest upon them, and I shall be eased. And they shall know that I, יהוה, have spoken it in My ardour, when I have completed My wrath upon them.

KJV – Ezekiel/Yechezk’El 5:13 Thus shall mine anger H639 be accomplished, and I will cause my furyH2534 to rest upon them, and I will be comforted: and they shall know that I the LORD have spoken it in my zeal, when I have accomplished my fury in them.

The verse above was stunning to me when I first found it. I realized that GOD/ELOHIM [FATHER/SON/HOLY SPIRIT] has to do this! HE sends HIS Wrath out to EASE HIS displeasure so HE can be comforted! That is HUGE!!! All the Biblical signs around us of HIS judgement per Scripture: storms, fires, floods, famine, pestilence, plague, volcanoes, earthquakes, etc are all HIM easing HIS displeasure, not mother nature which is just another name for spiritual wickedness/the harlot! While there are different factors that men influence in regards to the climate, GOD/ELOHIM is in complete control! AMEN!!! We are somewhere in the time of the end and per Scripture, things are going to be getting worse!

GOD/ELOHIM has to take care of HIMSELF, too!  May HE do what HE needs to do because without HIM we are nothing!!! We can ask HIM to change HIS mind or for a lesser event, for mercy and compassion, and see what HE decides to do! HE needs much praise, and thanks, and blessing these days for whatever HE decides to do or not do! Remember, HE knows the whole picture, HE knows what is best! Remember too these are like the days of Noah again, when GOD/ELOHIM wanted to destroy HIS whole creation and HE did not because of one man and his family, praise ELOHIM’S NAME even all HIS NAMES!!! AMEN!!!

Strong’s H639 – ‘aph

The KJV translates Strongs H639 in the following manner:anger (172x), wrath (42x), face (22x), nostrils (13x), nose (12x), angry (4x), longsuffering (with H750) (4x), before (2x), countenance (1x), forbearing (1x), forehead (1x), snout (1x), worthy (1x).

aph, af; from H599; properly, the nose or nostril; hence, the face, and occasionally a person; also (from the rapid breathing in passion) ire:—anger(-gry), before, countenance, face, forebearing, forehead, (long-) suffering, nose, nostril, snout, × worthy, wrath.

  1. nostril, nose, face

  2. anger

From root Strong’s H599 – ‘anaph

The KJV translates Strongs H599 in the following manner:angry (13x), displeased (1x).

ânaph, aw-naf’; a primitive root; to breathe hard, i.e. be enraged:—be angry (displeased).

  1. to be angry, to be displeased, to breathe hard

    1. (Qal) to be angry (of God)

    2. (Hithpael) to be angry (always of God)

Strong’s H2534 – chemah

  1. heat, rage, hot displeasure, indignation, anger, wrath, poison, bottles

    1. heat

      1. fever

      2. venom, poison (fig.)

    2. burning anger, rage

From root Strong’s H3179 – yacham

  1. to be hot, conceive

    1. (Qal)

      1. to be hot, become hot

      2. to mate (of animals)

      3. to be or become hot (fig. of anger)

    2. (Piel)

      1. to conceive (sexually)

      2. to be in heat (of animals)

Exodus/Sh’mot 32:10 Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath H639 may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them: and I will make of thee a great nation.

II Samuel/Sh’mu’el Bet 22:9 There went up a smoke out of his nostrils, H639 and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by it.

Job/Iyov 4:9 By the blast of God they perish, and by the breath of his nostrils H639 are they consumed.

Psalm/Tehillim 18:8 There went up a smoke out of his nostrils, H639 and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by it.

Psalm/Tehillim 18:15 Then the channels of waters were seen, and the foundations of the world were discovered at thy rebuke, O LORD, at the blast of the breath of thy nostrils. H639

Psalm/Tehillim 21:9 Thou shalt make them as a fiery oven in the time of thine anger: the LORD shall swallow them up in his wrath, H639 and the fire shall devour them.

Psalm/Tehillim 78:49  He cast upon them the fierceness of his anger, H639 wrath, and indignation, and trouble, by sending evil angels among them.

Psalm/Tehillim 78:50 He made a way to his anger; H639 he spared not their soul from death, but gave their life over to the pestilence;

Psalm/Tehillim 90:7 For we are consumed by thine anger, H639 and by thy wrath are we troubled.

Psalm 95:11/Tehillim Unto whom I sware in my wrath H639 that they should not enter into my rest.

Psalm 106:40/Tehillim Therefore was the wrath H639 of the LORD kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance.

Isaiah/YeshaYahu 5:25 Therefore is the anger H639 of the LORD kindled against his people, and he hath stretched forth his hand against them, and hath smitten them: and the hills did tremble, and their carcasses were torn in the midst of the streets. For all this his anger H639 is not turned away, but his hand is stretched out still.

Isaiah/YeshaYahu 13:3 I have commanded my sanctified ones, I have also called my mighty ones for mine anger, H639 even them that rejoice in my highness.

Isaiah/YeshaYahu 42:25 So he poured out on them his burning anger, the violence of war. It enveloped them in flames, yet they did not understand; it consumed them, but they did not take it to heart.

Ezekiel/Y’chez’kel 13:13 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; I will even rend it with a stormy wind in my fury; and there shall be an overflowing shower in mine anger, H639 and great hailstones in my fury to consume it.

Ezekiel/Y’chez’kel 20:8 But they rebelled against me, and would not hearken unto me: they did not every man cast away the abominations of their eyes, neither did they forsake the idols of Egypt: then I said, I will pour out my fury upon them, to accomplish my anger H639 against them in the midst of the land of Egypt.

Ezekie/Y’chez’kel 23:25 And I will set my jealousy against thee, and they shall deal furiously with thee: they shall take away thy nose H639 and thine ears; and thy remnant shall fall by the sword: they shall take thy sons and thy daughters; and thy residue shall be devoured by the fire.

Amos/ 4:10 I have sent among you the pestilence after the manner of Egypt: your young men have I slain with the sword, and have taken away your horses; and I have made the stink of your camps to come up unto your nostrils: H639 yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the LORD.

Should paisley be worn by Believers in CHRIST/the MESSIAH?

Below are excerpts from two sites that show information on the pagan origins of paisley. I have also read that it has roots as a fertility symbol too. I used to be an interior decorator and I can share with you that more textiles are being manufactured with patterns originating from various country’s heritages. What ELOHIM’S [Hebrew word for GOD and who I believe is FATHER/SON/HOLY SPIRIT] people today may not be thinking about clearly is that HE gave HIS Way to the Hebrew nation. That meant ALL other nation’s were pagan, worshiping other gods! ELOHIM/GOD is very clear in Scripture that HE is who HE is and the enemy is who the enemy is! Also, that HIS people are to be separated from every way and hold of the enemy!

It looks like many patterns originated from design motifs used in celebrating, offering thanks, and worshiping pagan gods. I have met Christians who told me they never liked paisley. I stay away from many patterns and images [second command Exodus/Sh’mot 20] and only wear solids or stripes or checks that are simple and do not draw attention. I do have some lace that I have wondered about and have prayed about.

Continue reading

Is speaking in tongues truth or a deception?

Acts 2: And suddenly there came from heaven a sound like a mighty rushing wind, and it filled the entire house where they were sitting. And divided tongues as of fire appeared to them and rested[a] on each one of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.  What is interesting to me is how many people who believe they speak in tongues have had the above event happen to them?

It even says that the HOLY SPIRIT came down from Heaven and HE rested/settled on JESUS/YESHUA when HE was being baptized: Matthew/Mattityahu 3:16, Luke 3:22, John/Yochanan 1:32. This bears witness with these verses in Isaiah. Isaiah/Yesha’Yahu 11:1-5  Then a shoot will spring from the stem of Jesse, And a branch from his roots will bear fruit. The Spirit of the LORD will rest on Him, The spirit of wisdom and understanding, The spirit of counsel and strength, The spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD. And He will delight in the fear of the LORD, And He will not judge by what His eyes see, Nor make a decision by what His ears hear; but with righteousness He will judge the poor, And decide with fairness for the afflicted of the earth; And He will strike the earth with the rod of His mouth, And with the breath of His lips He will slay the wicked. Also righteousness will be the belt about His loins, And faithfulness the belt about His waist.

I met David in Ohio who told me that when he was in his 20’s a flame of fire came down from the sky and hit him in his forehead. I went to Florida 2 weeks later and met Jonathan who told me that 2 weeks prior he was in his car at night and a flame of fire in the sky was following him! Continue reading